agilebrit: (Secret Cabal of Unicorn Fundies)
And, you know, the idea sounds pretty cool. As a Christian, I like to think that I'm not the only one of us toiling away in the trenches here.

That being said.

I am unsure of my welcome at a thing like this, because while I'm a fairly fundy fundamentalist in my doctrine, barely anything I actually write qualifies as "family friendly." Yes, I write fantasy and science fiction, with a smattering of horror, so "realism" goes out the door just on the premise--but the characters populating those stories still have to be people that readers can relate to. These characters rarely share my beliefs, and they drink, swear, and kill people on a depressingly regular basis, because that's how real people act in the sort of situations I'm interested in writing about.

My fiction is not a platform for my religion, and I don't want to be pigeonholed like that anyway. Besides, I write short fiction. Where are the Christian markets for that? And do they pay anything? Because yes, getting paid is important. I don't sub to "for the love" markets and I'm not going to start just because they're Christian.

So, I'll probably be forever at the fringes of this thing, no matter which side I'm looking from. "Gritty Christian" might be a thing, and I've now penned four stories starring recognizably Biblical angels and demons (sort of, I guess), but the subject matter of two of those stories is frankly disturbing and I'm pretty sure that my sainted mother-in-law (who is a lovely lady I love dearly) would be appalled by them.

But, hey, the Bible isn't exactly filled with sweetness and light either. And maybe I'm wrong and I'd be welcomed with open arms. I'll definitely keep an eye on them and see who populates the guest list. Maybe I'll even go, if finances permit and it doesn't conflict with the local ComicCon...
agilebrit: (Guri praying)
And I'd like a word.

I'm glad you've finally noticed me. That's awesome. I see that you're planning a bunch of Biblical epics for next year.

However, you'll pardon me, I hope, for being... wary. You see, I've rather noticed that not only do you have a distressing tendency to disrespect your source material for these epics, but many of you have an active antipathy toward it. And an active antipathy to me, for that matter. So, to be honest? I don't trust you to actually do this right.

And then, when we don't lap up whatever you decide to slap up there on the screen, and it bombs instead, you'll shrug and say "Gee, I guess these things don't pay after all." Let me disabuse you of that notion. These things will pay--as long as you give a bare nod to the accuracy of the text you're adapting. I know you guys hate Mel Gibson, but have a look at how he did, and then have a look at how Scorsese did. Which would you rather have?

Respect my faith, and I will reward you with cashy money, although you may lose cred with your liberal pals. Disrespect it, and you will see not a dime, but your cred will be intact and you won't have to tell people "no, I don't really believe all that stuff, I just did it so I could sleep on a big pile of hundred-dollar bills in a solid-gold brick house" at your Hollyweird cocktail parties. And, you know, I don't give a crap about your motives. I give a crap about the results. If your money-grubbing motive means I'm entertained for two solid hours without having my faith shat upon, I'm cool with that.

I hope you'll understand why I'll wait to hear from people I trust before I plant my butt in a seat. And, no, Rotten Tomatoes doesn't count in this case.
agilebrit: (Secret Cabal of Unicorn Fundies)
I just read some guidelines for a new antho that implied that atheists and agnostics were "marginalized" in the SF/F community. I won't name the antho, because there's no sense burning bridges, but that strikes me as...

Well. Patently ridiculous.

Marginalized among "mainstream" America? Perhaps, depending where you live--Lampasas, TX, yeah; San Francisco, not so much. Marginalized in the SF/F community? Dude, no. Don't look now, but you gotta little persecution complex on your sleeve there. This gets back to the whole thing where I feel "marginalized" as a right-wing, religious, gun-toting woman writing in the SF/F genre. I mean, seriously, it's gotten to the point where I'm surprised if a SF/F writer (male or female) is actually conservative. And if they're religious too??? Madness!

Sometimes, I just... side-eye this business. Really hard.
agilebrit: (Guri praise the Lord)
NanoPals on Twitter today asked, "How does religion play into your worlds? Do you allow your personal beliefs to flavour your work? Wha do your characters believe? What kind of book do you prefer to read - one that heavily includes personal faith or one that shies away from a characters viewpoints. Do pious characters bother you if they stray too far from what you personally believe?"

I'll duplicate my comment there and expand on it. It's not like I'm doing anything else, like editing, right now anyway.

Depends on what I'm writing, really. I write mainly short stories, and I've done five (out of 27) that have overtly religious characters. Three of them have recognizably Biblical angels and demons as major characters. And, yeah, that's my own Christianity bleeding into my fiction, but I still try to make them their own and not my mouthpiece. Preachiness is annoying, and so these characters are still PEOPLE in their own right with their own opinions, shaped by their experiences and their own beliefs--beliefs that don't necessarily line up with my own.

I also realize going in that these stories are hard sells in any market. They're too Christian for the secular market and not Christian enough for the Christian market (because of subject matter and some salty language)--and two of them are over 15K words and under 20K words long, and the third LOOKS like a standard "guy sells soul to devil" story, even though it's not--so they're stuck in a kind of limbo of unsaleableness.

But the beauty of the current system is that, once I've exhausted the paying markets, I can self-pub them and maybe they'll find their own market, you know?

I have also written stories where the internal theology in no way reflects my own, and many, many where religion isn't even a thing except for the occasional startled or mournful "Oh, God." It really depends on what the story needs more than anything else.

When reading, I'm fine with characters and worldviews that don't reflect my own beliefs, as long as the story is internally consistent and tells a good tale. The trope I despise above all else, however, is the one-note Stupid/Evil/Stupidly Evil Christian Character. It's boring, it's lazy, and I do my level best to subvert it on a regular basis by writing good-guy religious characters when the story calls for something like that.

And this is stupidly long, so under the cut it goes. )
agilebrit: (Guri praying)
Which got me to thinking about how Christians are treated in "mainstream" entertainment, and how Jim Butcher's Dresden Files series is a refreshing breath of fresh air.

For years, it was a given: Introduce a Character of Faith, and that character would soon be shown to be crazy, evil, stupid, bigoted, hypocritical, or all of the above. Stephen King, you're brilliant in other ways, but I'm looking at you. Any cop show where a priest or pastor was involved in a plot at all, yep, he did it. It got old. It got very very old very very fast. They were never just normal people, or God forbid, the actual hero of the piece. They were set up to be knocked down, and Hollyweird seemed to like it that way. Oh, sure, there were a few exceptions (Father Dowling, I suppose, and Touched by an Angel; and I adore Father Mulcahey on MASH), but those seemed more like bones tossed to appease the frothing masses than anything else.

Science fiction was no less guilty. Possibly more guilty. Christians were either villains or buffoons, and there was very little in-between there. That's if faith was even a Thing in the far-flung future where humans were now More Educated Than That and the idea of God was a Quaint Throwback to More Primitive Times. In fantasy, you have your Burn The Witch villains, again, if faith in the God of the Bible is even mentioned at all. I stopped reading SF/F for a long time because of this.

And then the lovely and effulgent [livejournal.com profile] appomattoxco introduced me to the Dresden Files. It was the first time I'd dipped my toe back into written fantasy in awhile, although I was an avid watcher of Buffy and Angel by then. I side-eyed real hard when Michael Carpenter was introduced, waiting for the inevitable Gotcha Moment.

It never came.

And for that, I will always be fiercely, fiercely grateful to Jim Butcher. I was at a panel on Faith in Fiction at this year's WorldCon, and brought Michael up, and one of the panelists (I don't remember who) actually looked dismissive and practically offended. Apparently Michael's faith is too... simple, or something. And I realize that the sort of simple rock-solid faith that says "God said it, I believe it, that settles it" gives a lot of people an uncomfortableness, because they're not that certain of anything and how dare you be (or something), but for some of us, faith really is that simple and it's not a stretch for it to be that simple for a fictional character.

I mean, do we struggle with it? Of course we do. But the Dresden Files is first person from Harry's viewpoint, so we see Michael through the lens of Harry's eyes. I'm pretty sure Michael keeps any struggles with his faith under wraps where Harry doesn't see it; I know that I'm pretty private about those kinds of things myownself. And even Michael had his own Moment of Darkness when he nearly, in a cold rage, killed the dude who kidnapped his daughter.

And I'm probably rambling by now, as I tend to do. I think my point is that Jim Butcher opened up a door with Michael--where an overtly Christian character could actually be, if not the hero, at least a hero, and it's given me, myself, more confidence to write Christian characters who are also heroes, and to write angelic and demonic characters that are at least nominally Biblical.

So maybe this is, in a way, a love letter to Jim Butcher and Michael Carpenter, and, to a lesser extent, Uriel. Thank you, Mr. Butcher, and I look forward to seeing you at MisCon where I can possibly pick your brain.
agilebrit: (Urge to bitchslap)
Dear Mr. Prothero:

I'm electing a President, not a pastor. And I would a hell of a lot rather vote for someone who's been going to the Mormon church all his life than someone who's been going to Rev. Wright's church. At least the Mormon church is not going to scream "God damn America" at me. The LDS people may not share a few tenets of my faith (and yes, I have major problems with major points of their theology, so what), but they share my actual values.

The current occupant of the White House has proven over the last four years that he does not share my values. Therefore, he will not get my vote. And I'm not a "hypocrite" because you suddenly realized that your stupid paradigm was wrong. No, Mr. Prothero, rather, you have just proved that you know absolutely nothing about the people you're purporting to blog about. Of course, you work for CNN, so any credibility you thought you had was shot anyway, but this just puts the final nail in the coffin. "Your Take" is... well. Idiotic. Enjoy your wake-up call.

Regards,
[livejournal.com profile] agilebrit

I am amused by the fact that the liberal "wisdom" was that evangelicals would sit this one out because an OMG MORMON!*gasp* was running for President. Turns out, not so much, which I am just pleased as punch by. And now they're flailing all over themselves trying to figure out why.

Maybe if they, you know, actually talked to a few of us, they could figure it out. But that would involve getting icky Christian cooties all over them. Instead, they'll remain puzzled and rail about "hypocrisy" when it's really no such thing. It's just us voting our values.

PS: I really don't want to hear how my values are wrong, okay. I know that the vast majority of LJ and probably my flist disagrees with me on them. I don't feel like having the argument, so let's not.

October 2020

S M T W T F S
    123
45678910
1112131415 16 17
18192021222324
25262728293031

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 6th, 2025 12:01 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios
OSZAR »